Deductive reasoning uses given information, premises or accepted general rules to reach a proven conclusion. On the other hand, inductive logic or reasoning **involves making generalizations based upon behavior observed in specific cases**.

Besides, What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in terms of conjectures?

Inductive Reasoning connotes the argument in which the premises give reasons in **support of the probable truth of the conjecture**. Deductive reasoning is the fundamental form of valid reasoning, wherein the premises give guarantee of the truth of conjecture.

Keeping this in mind, What is the similarity between induction and deduction? Both deduction and induction are a type of **inference**, which means reaching a conclusion based on evidence and reasoning. Deduction moves from idea to observation, while induction moves from observation to idea.

Related Contents

- 1 What is the similarities between valid and invalid arguments?
- 2 What is inductive reasoning in terms of conjecture?
- 3 What is conjecture in inductive reasoning?
- 4 How do inductive and deductive reasoning complement each other?
- 5 What are the similarities and differences between valid and invalid sound and unsound arguments?
- 6 What is the similarity and difference between sound and cogent argument?
- 7 What is the similarities between sound and cogent arguments?
- 8 What is conjecture reasoning?
- 9 What is meant by inductive reasoning?
- 10 What is inductive reasoning explain with example?
- 11 What is conjecture formula?
- 12 How do you identify a conjecture?
- 13 Is inductive and deductive method complementary?
- 14 What are the roles of inductive and deductive reasoning in the process of scientific inquiry?
- 15 Can an argument be inductive and deductive?
- 16 What is the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument?
- 17 What is the difference between valid arguments and fallacious arguments?
- 18 What is sound argument and unsound argument?
- 19 What is the difference between a sound and a valid argument?
- 20 What is the difference between strong arguments and cogent arguments?
- 21 What is the difference between Cogent and Uncogent argument?

## What is the similarities between valid and invalid arguments?

Valid: an argument is valid if and only if it is necessary that if all of the premises are true, then the **conclusion is true**; if all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true; it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false. Invalid: an argument that is not valid.

## What is inductive reasoning in terms of conjecture?

Inductive Reasoning is **a reasoning that is based on patterns you observe**. If you observe a pattern in a sequence, you can use inductive reasoning to decide the next successive terms of the sequence. A conclusion you reach using inductive reasoning is called a conjecture .

**What is conjecture in inductive reasoning?**

Inductive Reasoning. A conjecture is **an unproven statement that is based on observations**. You use inductive reasoning when you find a pattern in specific cases and then write a conjecture for the general case.

**How do inductive and deductive reasoning complement each other?**

**Induction and deduction always complement each other in reasoning**, but proper induction is not necessary for the truth of deduction. Induction produces general conclusions from specific instances, but deduction produces knowledge of specific instances from general knowledge.

**What are the similarities and differences between valid and invalid sound and unsound arguments?**

The key difference between sound and unsound argument is that **a sound argument is valid and has true premises whereas an unsound argument is invalid and/or has at least one false premises**. Soundness is a technical feature of an argument. It helps us to determine whether the conclusion of an argument is true.

**What is the similarity and difference between sound and cogent argument?**

A sound argument is a valid argument that has **true** premises. A cogent argument is a strong non-deductive argument that has true premises.

**What is the similarities between sound and cogent arguments?**

Similar to the concept of soundness for deductive arguments, **a strong inductive argument with true premises is** termed cogent. To say an argument is cogent is to say it is good, believable; there is good evidence that the conclusion is true. A weak argument cannot be cogent, nor can a strong one with a false premise(s).

**What is conjecture reasoning?**

Conjecture: **A statement you believe to be true based on inductive reasoning**.

**What is meant by inductive reasoning?**

Inductive reasoning is **a logical thinking process in which multiple premises that are believed to be true are combined to draw a conclusion**. It is a process that works in the opposite direction to deductive reasoning.

**What is inductive reasoning explain with example?**

Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. … An example of inductive logic is, **“The coin I pulled from the bag is a penny.**

**What is conjecture formula?**

A conjecture is a **mathematical statement that has not yet been rigorously proved**. Conjectures arise when one notices a pattern that holds true for many cases. … A conjecture is an important step in problem solving; it is not just a tool for professional mathematicians.

**How do you identify a conjecture?**

In general, a conjecture is like your opinion about something that you notice or even an educated guess. Looking at the following numbers: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12. What would be the next number? Most likely, you are thinking 14.

**Is inductive and deductive method complementary?**

While inductive and deductive approaches to research seem quite different, **they can actually be rather complementary**. In some cases, researchers will plan for their research to include multiple components, one inductive and the other deductive.

**What are the roles of inductive and deductive reasoning in the process of scientific inquiry?**

The **inductive approach begins with a set of empirical observations, seeking patterns in those observations, and then theorizing about those patterns**. The deductive approach begins with a theory, developing hypotheses from that theory, and then collecting and analyzing data to test those hypotheses.

**Can an argument be inductive and deductive?**

It is not inductive. Given the way the terms “deductive argument” and “inductive argument” are defined here, **an argument is always one or the other and never both**, but in deciding which one of the two it is, it is common to ask whether it meets both the deductive standards and inductive standards.

**What is the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument?**

A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the **conclusion** nevertheless to be false. … A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true.

**What is the difference between valid arguments and fallacious arguments?**

An argument is valid **if the conclusion must be true whenever the premises** are true. In other words, an argument is valid if the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. … An argument that is not valid is invalid or fallacious. If an argument is valid and its premises are true, the argument is sound.

**What is sound argument and unsound argument?**

An argument is sound if all the premises are true and the argument is valid. … An argument is **unsound if some of the premises are false** or the argument is invalid.

**What is the difference between a sound and a valid argument?**

An argument form is valid if and only **if whenever the premises are all true**, then conclusion is true. An argument is valid if its argument form is valid. For a sound argument, An argument is sound if and only if it is valid and all its premises are true.

**What is the difference between strong arguments and cogent arguments?**

Cogent arguments are just strong arguments with all true premises. Strong arguments are just arguments whose inference between the premises and **conclusion** is considered more probable than not. Be careful to keep this in mind, cogent arguments, unlike sound arguments, can have a false conclusion!

**What is the difference between Cogent and Uncogent argument?**

A cogent argument is an inductive argument that is both strong and all of its premises are true. An uncogent argument is an inductive argument that is **either weak or has at least one** false premise.

## Comments